Egypt: Commissioner's Advisory Report On Baha'is Released
In preparation for Egypt's Supreme Administrative Court session scheduled for 20 November 2006, the long-awaited government Commissioner's Advisory Report that was requested by the court was released on Thursday, 12 October 2006, and a summary of the report was published in Rose el-Yousef newspaper yesterday. The 24 page report, as expected, supported the opinions of the appellants, i.e. the Ministry of Interior and the other government agencies who had appealed the lower Administrative Court's ruling which granted the Baha'is their right to indicate their religion on government-issued official documents.
It is not surprising that this clearly biased and one-sided report repeats the exact same illogical and unjustified statements and conclusions that have been circulating among the Egyptian fundamentalist establishment for many years.
In brief, it concluded that since the Baha'i Faith is not recognized in Egypt as a "divine religion," therefore its followers in that land have no rights whatsoever and that they simply do not exist! Consequently, they concluded that Egypt's Constitutional guarantees of freedom of belief and religion do not apply to the Baha'is. That Egypt is not bound to its commitment as a cosignatory to the United Nations Universal Declaration on Human Rights, and that the Baha'is, in Egypt, should not be under its protection--since, as far as they are concerned, Egypt should have no obligations towards them! That the Baha'i are apostates (whether or not they descended from an Islamic background). That they are a threat to the "general [public] order" of the State, and that all their marriages are null and void.... That "methods must be defined that would insure that Baha'is are identified, confronted and singled out so that they could be watched carefully, isolated and monitored in order to protect the rest of the population as well as Islam from their danger, influence and their teachings." The report also calls for the original plaintiffs (the Baha'i family that won the case) to be charged for all court costs!
The travesty of this report is that it identifies the Baha'is as a threat to the nation, isolates them in a corner, deprives them from every right to citizenship, strips them from all their civil rights, calls for their elimination and expulsion, declares their children as illegitimate and their men and women as cohabiting out-of-wedlock.... Above all, Rose el-Yousef newspaper made sure that this report got published expeditiously so that it would serve its own purposes and agenda in its propaganda campaign against the Baha'is.
If the Supreme Administrative Court accepts this report on its face, then we should wonder if any sense of decency or humanity can have a place in that country!
As most of us know, these allegations, misrepresentations, illogical and slanderous conclusions have no basis in fact and have no legal justification. It is inconceivable that a modern civilization in the 21st century could degenerate to this point of oppression of its minorities under the watchful eye of the rest of the world. One would certainly hope that, if in the remote possibility that such conclusions and judgements became contemplated for implementation by the court, the anticipated consequent outrage expressed by the world would be a deterrent to such possible outcome.
It is also prayerfully hoped and expected that the Supreme Administrative Court will stand for justice and for its duty to uphold the guarantee of human rights to its constituency, and that President Mubarak will stand for his noble calling and quest for justice for all his citizens when he addresses the nation this upcoming Thursday as was published in this previous post.
It is essential that when religious tolerance is promoted, it must also include tolerance towards religious beliefs other than Egypt’s "recognized three." Anything less than that would be a waste of time and of no use. We can't say that “we are tolerant to only the few we recognize, and anything else is not our concern.” This would not be tolerance.
The issue is not whether or not a religion is divine--this is a whole different matter--the issue is that any religious belief must be respected, regardless of its origin or legitimacy. This is how today's world functions and is what the United Nations Universal Declaration on Human Rights has been based on. It is essential that this nation must provide the guarantee of equality and of civil rights to all Egyptian citizens, even those who happen to have a different religious belief. No law-abiding human being in this world expects any less than that. Egypt is no exception.
The Baha'is are not, and have never been, a threat to anyone or anything, and in particular "General [Public] Order" (al-Nezam el-Aam) as claimed by the many proclamations made by Egypt’s fundamentalist establishment as well as the biased sections of the media; all this rhetoric has been fabricated in order to defame the Baha'is...it is an excuse and a "catch phrase" that is intended to manipulate the masses and justify the injustices.
The report also calls for the original plaintiffs (the Baha'i family) to be responsible for all the costs of the court. (How dare these nobody, no good Baha'is request ID papers for their daughters? They should be thankful that the government has not been charging them all these 160 years for the air they breath).
ReplyDeleteThis reminds me of something I heard a few years ago, .. that after the revolution in Iran, families of executed Baha'is were officially billed by the government of Iran for the price of the bullets they used to kill their children with.
Another glaring contradiction in this report, is its recommendation that "methods must be defined that would insure that Baha'is are identified and singled out so that they could be watched carefully, isolated and monitored in order to protect the rest of the population as well as Islam from their influence and their teachings." !!!
Wouldn't issuing them ID cards listing their religion serve this very purpose? (Which takes us back to square one -- the request by the Baha'is that they get issued ID cards).
To comment on this deservedly, would require another 24 pages, but how many are those that have eyes to see and ears to hear?
I'll translate this to Portuguese and publish in my weblog.
ReplyDeleteI wonder what would Muslims say if they were treated this way in any country where they are a minority. No ID Cards, no civil rights, no citizenship...
It is truly pathetic....
ReplyDeleteLet us wait for the Court to convene on 20 November. Sooner or later justice will prevail.
The country needs to get hold of itself....
I wish I had the money to fly there on Nov. 20th. I'm not sure what is brewing. It sure seems dark, but just before the dawn.
ReplyDeleteEdo River rising
I used to see your blog.
ReplyDeleteOnce more, congratulations!
It's precious.
The mulláhs are trying to isolate the bahá'ís but more than everything they are against Islam.
I thought translate your report to portuguese but Marco said he will do that - and better than me.
The self-serving hypocrisy in the Rose el-Yousef article is staggering!
ReplyDeleteEdo River:
ReplyDeleteYou should try to go...it would be a trip of a lifetime for you....
Joao:
Thank you and God bless you....
Barney:
Welcome back...have you found the iron kettle yet?
Marco:
Thank you for translating this...you are doing great service.
Faisal:
Thank you for the reminder.
"If the Supreme Administrative Court accepts this report on its face, then we should wonder if any sense of decency or humanity can have a place in that country!"
ReplyDeleteIT DID HAPPEN ON 16 JANUARY 2006!
------------------------------
"As most of us know, these allegations, misrepresentations, illogical and slanderous conclusions have no basis in fact and have no legal justification. It is inconceivable that a modern civilization in the 21st century could degenerate to this point of oppression of its minorities under the watchful eye of the rest of the world. One would certainly hope that, if in the remote possibility that such conclusions and judgements became contemplated for implementation by the court, the anticipated consequent outrage expressed by the world would be a deterrent to such possible outcome."
THE OUTRAGE DID HAPPEN, BUT APARANTLEY WAS NOT A DETERRENT!
-----------------------------
"It is also prayerfully hoped and expected that the Supreme Administrative Court will stand for justice and for its duty to uphold the guarantee of human rights to its constituency..."
DID NOT HAPPEN!
------------------
"...and that President Mubarak will stand for his noble calling and quest for justice for all his citizens when he addresses the nation this upcoming Thursday as was published in this previous post."
??????????